Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusMay-08-2015 7:40 PMtaebosaurus.
"
length: 32 feet long
weight: 4 tons.
height: 14 feet tall.
weapons: powerful bone crushing bite.
Disasvantages: slower, less agile, weaker arms.
advantages: probably bulkier, stronger bite?
yangchuanosaurus.
length: 33 feet long
Weight: 4 tons.
height: 14 feet.
weapons: bite, claws, hatchet bite.
disadvantages: not as bulky, weaker bite?
i say this is a 50/50 fight but I'm leaning towards yang just slightly.
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexMay-09-2015 3:28 AM50/50 though I am leaning a tad in Tabo's favour.
Sure, it wasn't as agile, but it was close to Yang in that sense. Tarbo's bite wasn't bone crushing to the degree of T-Rex's, but it was powerful. Tarbo's bite was a combination of bone crushing and cutting.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
Tyrant king
MemberCompsognathusMay-09-2015 3:59 AMIt was mostly for crushing rathe then cutting. Yang had FAR superior dentition then tarbo for cutting and tearing flesh.
Lord Vader
MemberTyrannosaurus RexMay-09-2015 6:13 PMI am aware of tha. It wasn't cutting to the degree Yang has, but it's not quite to bone crusher of T-Rex. It's more like 70/30 (70 being crusher and 30 being cutter). It's not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but it isn't the dullest either.
Jack of all trades. Master of none
